He thereafter testifies that he saw Lindsay try on the necklace and then walk out of the store without paying for it. You can reap all kinds of benefits by starting cross with a strong impeachment. Example: lawyer Frank Foghorn is interviewing a witness in an accident case who tells Foghorn that Foghorn's client was jaywalking outside the crosswalk when struck by the defendant's . 90.608 (1) recognizes that one may impeach a witness by introducing statements of the witness which are inconsistent with the witness' present testimony. You must keep your cool and not tip off the witness. Simpson case was televised nationally, and millions of viewers watched the proceedings. He viewed it as capable of serving two ends: proving untruths and completing the story by eliciting facts that remained suppressed or undeveloped on direct examination, including the remaining and qualifying circumstances of the subject of testimony, as known to the witness., Precisely because of the presence of dual objectives, timing is everything. Said differently, assume a witness has information useful to the cross-examiner but also made an averment during direct examination that must be impeached with a clearly contradictory prior inconsistent statement. A statement is "inconsistent" "if under any rational theory it might lead to any relevant conclusion different from any other relevant conclusion resulting from anything the witness said." Weinstein's Federal Evidence 613.04 [1]. State v. Kimber, 48 Conn. App. Johnson v. United States, 520 U.S. 461, 465-66 (1997) (discussing materiality of false statements in context of perjury). Not a second longer. The US Supreme Court ruled that the president was not immune to this lawsuit, allowing it to continue (Clinton v. Jones, 2011). Define perjury by inconsistent statements and subornation of perjury. These are the type of questions that should guide your decision when to impeach. Unfortunately, liars in the courtroom may only be caught out by the inconsistent statements they make throughout a case. The Model Penal Code has a similar provision (Model Penal Code 241.1(5)). It also forces a predictable move by your opponent. Penal Law 200.03, 2011) or bribery that results in someones prosecution or incarceration for a felony (N.Y. Simpson. Some jurisdictions have a requirement of corroborative evidence for perjury, which necessitates the testimony of two witnesses to support a conviction, similar to a treason conviction (Tex. False Statements Are Perjury. Statements inconsistent with the statement the . Connecticut Jury Instructions 53a-156, accessed May 5, 2011, http://www.jud.ct.gov/ji/criminal/part4/4.5-9.htm. A statement is counted as perjury only if it was given while the witness was under oath and in front of a court or tribunal that has the mandate to carry out the investigation. Isabel and the umpire probably have not committed bribery in this case. Enter your email address to receive notifications of new Temple Law Advocacy and Evidence Blog posts by email. Example of Perjury by Inconsistent Statements Subornation of Perjury Example of a Case Lacking an Element of Subornation of Perjury Perjury Grading Bribery Elements Prosecutorial Burden in Bribery Prosecutions Example of Bribery Another Example of Bribery Example of a Case Lacking an Element of Bribery Bribery When No Authority to Act Is Present Make sure that the impeachment is clear to everyone; Get the jurys permission before you attempt to impeach. Asking the impeachment at the end if safe and effective. The cons: When youve ended with an impeachment, the redirect examiner will most likely follow-up with an explanation or clarification of the previous testimony, which may minimize the impact. And cross points, like all trial points, impact most when impressing best, which means at the moment we present them not later, on closing, no matter how great we are told, and believe, we are. If it was my own witnesss testimony that warranted impeachment, ordinarily, that was a foreseeable circumstance and one that I would preview for the jury during my opening statement. For example, even though a literal application of the Rule would suggest that any prior inconsistent statement is admissible as substantive evidence so long as it is one of the three enumerated types under oath, tape recorded, or signed that may not necessarily be so. Like almost everything else in law and advocacy, of course, placement of an impeachment by prior inconsistent statement depends on the tone and purpose of any cross-examination. Cal. Attorneys and other people who might advise a witness may be targets of subornation of perjury accusations. (1) A person is guilty of tampering with a witness if he or she attempts to induce a witness or person he or she has reason to believe is about to be called as a witness in any official proceeding or a person whom he or she has reason to believe may have information relevant to a criminal investigation or the abuse or neglect of a minor child to: Penal Law 200.04, 2011). The obstruction of justice conviction resulted from Bondss evasive answer to the question of whether his personal trainer had ever injected him with steroids (Macur, J., 2011). Every plot must be elaborated to its closing. Example 1 The claimant claimed she couldn't work due to back pain and said that she could not sit or stand for more than a few minutes at a time. The prosecutor does not have to provide corroborative evidence and does not have the burden of proving Penal Code 86; Cal. A related offense is the crime of subornation of perjury, which typically involves coaching or persuading a person to commit perjury. He was never criminally prosecuted for perjury or obstruction of justice outside the impeachment procedure, although he was later disbarred for his behavior (Gearan, A., 2011). criminalizes perjury by inconsistent statements, Marcus could most likely be prosecuted for this offense. At the end of cross examination (unlike the very beginning), I would have also gained credibility as the questioner. Ultimately, we won the case because the technician made a statement that was not backed by science. In that trial is competitive storyshowing in context, H.T. This is the math we employ to best determine when to execute the classic commit-credit-confront prior inconsistent statement impeachment protocol: whether to start strong, as an opening salvo; to conclude, and end strong; or use as a pass-through, exploiting illogic in order to set up another headline. False statements and Perjury sentences can lead to a crime regarding the witness. Subornation of perjury is an offence under section 333 (1) of the Crimes Act 1900, which carries a maximum penalty of 7 years in prison. Assume for a moment that at trial, on direct examination, the Plaintiff testifies that when he went through the light it was green; however, when the Plaintiff testified during his deposition he testified that he couldnt remember what color the light was. When a witness unexpectedly changes their testimony, you must act calmly and with precision. The first common-law prohibition against witness perjury criminalized false testimony, given under oath, in a judicial proceeding, about a material issue. 5A-11, et seq., 2011), resisting arrest (18 Pa. Cons. In those circumstances delaying the impeachment until it fits naturally into the cross-examiners story will be appropriate. Stat. It constituted a critical lapse in judgment and a personal failure on my part for which I am solely and completely responsible (Historyplace.com, 2011). Figure 13.7 Comparison of Perjury by Inconsistent Statements and Subornation of Perjury. Penal Code 86, http://law.onecle.com/california/penal/86.html. A contradictory statement made in court signifies that the person making such statement has been untruthful at some point during their account. Stat. As for timing, there are no are hard and fast rules. N.Y. Is it best to, Or is the answer that classic law professor response of it depends? This conundrum was presented to trial advocacy experts nationally; the following is their guidance, the collective wisdom of the trial advocacy academy. In this video, President Clinton denies that he had sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky: President Clinton Apologizes to the Nation. Thus Marcus is probably not subject to prosecution for and conviction of perjury, based on his testimony in this case. [The contributors are presented alphabetically, with this author providing the concluding assessment. The defendant must be under oath when making the statement at issue in any perjury prosecution, and the oath must be administered by someone of legal authority or someone authorized to take evidence under oath (Connecticut Jury Instructions 531-156, 2011), including a referee, hearing examiner, commissioner, notary, or other person authorized to take evidence in connection with an official or judicial proceeding (Connecticut Jury Instructions 53a-156, 2011). If I want to contradict the direct, I bring it out in phase two. . The jury knew where the defense attorney was going and they understood the soft impeachment. The first type of perjury involves statements made under oath, and requires proof that: The second type of perjury involves unsworn statements, and requires proof that: State laws defining perjury are generally similar to the federal statute. Or now?), ending on the impeachment can help further the goals of cross. If I had evidence that the witness actually had a personal relationship with my opposing party, I would start the cross there. After the deposition, he was involved in an effort to get Ms. Lewinsky a federal job outside Washington, DC (Historyplace.com, 2011). Impeachment with a prior inconsistent statement is frightening for novice attorneys. Here are some examples of inconsistent statements that indicate a claimant is exaggerating symptoms. The considerate I just need to clear one thing up approach will temper the impeachment but likely secure the desired answer. I understand Professor Lippys motivation to gain credibility as the questioner before venturing into a witness impeachment. In the closing, he argued that the defendant was enraged when he saw his ex-wife with her boyfriend and that while at the moment he wanted to hurt and kill them, he really acted out of love. The defense opening was that the case was about love. the statement is one of identification of a person the declarant made after perceiving that person. Associate Professor of Law The definition of perjury is therefore much more complicated than many people realize. The evening of the grand jury investigation, the president appeared on national TV and admitted, Indeed, I did have a relationship with Ms. Lewinsky that was not appropriate. Stat. The federal statute requires that a person acted willfully, while Ohios statute says the person must have acted knowingly. Defendants may claim that they believed the statement to be true, and that they therefore did not have the required mental state. (18 U.S.C. Do a search online to find the office's website and click on the contact link there. Thus the harm element of subornation of perjury is lacking, and Marcus can be prosecuted only for attempted subornation of perjury or solicitation to commit perjury, rather than the completed offense. Thus all the elements of perjury appear to be present, and Marcus may be subject to prosecution for and conviction of this offense. Penalties for Perjury. At The End: Sometimes, the witness has some facts to confirm but also has testified on direct to things that are just incorrect. If so, is the witness lying about everything or just some things? Ann. If the witness denies the statement, you impeach. Because you have them on record, already. Marcus made two inconsistent statements while under a validly administered oath in Lindsay's conversion trial, which is a judicial proceeding. Bribery can also cover members of a state legislature (Cal. The biggest issues commonly encountered in any perjury prosecution are proving the validity of the oath, the defendants criminal intent, the materiality of the false statement, and any requirement of corroborative evidence. So long as you avoid the trap as the questioner of asking one question too many (like were you telling the truth then? AS 11.56.230. 13-2807, accessed May 7, 2011, http://law.onecle.com/arizona/criminal-code/13-2807.html. Lindsays conversion trial, which is a judicial proceeding. Ala. Code 13A-10-107, accessed May 6, 2011, http://law.onecle.com/alabama/criminal-code/13A-10-107.html. State and federal penalties for perjury include fines and prison terms upon conviction. Rev. In the book, the author wrote that under no circumstances should an agent or technician testify a certain way because it was not backed by science. In this example, both the judge and Isabel have likely committed bribery because most states criminalize the conferring, offering, and accepting and receiving a bribe as the criminal act elements. In fact, it was wrong. Tex. N.C. Gen. Stat. Once you establish a pattern of asking short declarative questions, its easier to get concessions. As Edgar Allan Poe once advised, the denouement or ending must always be in view. Retraction as a Defense. Bribery is typically graded as a felony (N.Y. If Marcuss jurisdiction Thus, as a practitioner, one needs to make the right choice based on the circumstances of the case. Thus, for example, a witness who is confronted with a learned treatise by opposing counsel cannot avoid being cross-examined on the text if he says, in effect "I am familiar with Jones on Bones. In most cases, if you want to report perjury you can start with your state's district attorney's office. There, it usually is best to structure your cross so that the impeachment comes toward the end of the cross. ], Director of A. Barry Cappello Program in Trial Advocacy, The best place for impeachment by prior inconsistent statement depends on your primary purpose. The Model Penal Code also has this corroborative evidence requirement (Model Penal Code 241.1(6)). 18 U.S.C. Ann. Legal definition of bribery, Duhaime.org website, accessed May 6, 2011, http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictionary/B/Bribery.aspx. 13-2705.Perjury by inconsistent statements. The perjury charges support the obstruction of justice charge, so the defense asked for a court dismissal of the obstruction of justice conviction in order to clear the way for an appeal (Ortiz, J. L., 2011). Penal Law 200.04, accessed May 6, 2011, http://law.onecle.com/new-york/penal/PEN0200.04_200.04.html. It establishes that (remember My Cousin Vinney?) (1) the conviction has been the subject of a pardon, annulment, certificate of rehabilitation, or other equivalent procedure based on a finding that the person has been rehabilitated, and the person has not been convicted of a later crime punishable by death or by imprisonment for more than one year; or The subject matter of the statement was material to the proceeding in which it was made. Professor of Law emeritus and former director of the Litigation Skills Program. Executing a clean impeachment requires careful planning and preparation. Federal law defines two types of perjury, each of which has multiple elements. penalty of perjury at a trial, hearing, or other proceeding, or in a deposition, or (B) consistent with the declarant's testimony and is . You may want it to be the last thing (or almost the last thing) your fact finder hears from the witness. Add to this example and assume that Marcus begs Janelle, another witness in Lindsays conversion trial, to say that she did not see him at Macys the day Lindsay stole the necklace. At that point, I think you have to ask yourself whether the contradiction is substantial enough on a meaningful enough fact that it is worth raising? It is easy to prove that a declarant took an oath. 4. . Review the statutes in the endnotes for common elements and grading of these offenses. Perhaps you wait until later in the cross to impeach. After the court commissioner administers an oath to tell the truth, Susannah takes the witness stand. Before testifying, Marcus took an oath that was administered by a court commissioner, also satisfying the perjury requirement that the defendant take an oath administered by someone with the legal authority or authorization to take evidence under oath. In Marcuss criminal perjury by inconsistent statements prosecution, the prosecutor need only offer evidence of the inconsistent 5A-11, et seq., accessed May 8, 2011, http://law.onecle.com/north-carolina/5a-contempt/index.html. When the intent requirement is general intent or knowledge that the statement is false, proof that the statement is false could give rise to an inference of intent (State v. Kimber, 2011). Federal law ( 18 USC 1621 ), for example, states that anyone found guilty of the crime will be fined or imprisoned for up to five years. Perjury is committed when a witness lies while under oath in a court hearing. For example, save the oath portion of the credit phase of the impeachment for the end, waiting until after confronting the witness with the prior statement to highlight that fact for the jury. One of the most common forms of impeachment during cross-examination at trial is with a prior inconsistent statement, such as deposition or affidavit testimony.The objective of impeachment is to establish that the witness is not a trustworthy witness, hence the reason it is referred to as . Perjury is generally graded as a felony (N.C. Gen. Stat. tent statement -in-kn-sis-tnt- : a witness's statement made out of court prior to testifying that is inconsistent with the witness's testimony and that may be offered to impeach the witness's credibility compare prior consistent statement And if the opportunity arises during cross, again, do your math: how significant was the inconsistency, and how material? The decision regarding when to use this potent tool depends on the goal. Stat. If there is no such chapter in my cross examination, then I would end the cross with the impeachment. Corroborative evidence is not required, and the prosecution does not have the burden of proving that one of the statements is false, just that one or the other was false and not believed by the defendant to be true (Ala. Code 13A-10-104, 2011). The primary issue in a bribery prosecution is proving the defendants criminal intent to enter into an agreement that influences the bribed individuals decision making. When the defense attorney on the case crossed the first responders, detective, and the victims themselves, he made sure he discussed all of the things the defendant did that told his clients story, then in a soft impeachment, every witness untangled the prosecutors attempt of making the defendant a monster. When an inconsistent statement is elicited on cross-examination, I recommend impeaching the witness right then and there. In actuality, Marcus was shopping for jewelry as a gift for his girlfriend. 843.08, 2011), refusing to aid a law enforcement officer when requested (N.Y. Therefore, perjury charges are more likely in high-profile cases. Marcus has not committed subornation of perjury in this case. Choose a delete action Empty this pageRemove this page and its subpages. Gearan, A., Clinton Disbarred by Supreme Court, Famguardian.org website, accessed May 9, 2011, http://famguardian.org/Subjects/LawAndGovt/News/ClintonDisbar-011001.htm. 5901, 2011). Review the example with Marcus in ***Section 13 "Example of Perjury". 2011] CONVICTIONS BASED ON LIES 335 presented false testimony calls into question the value of all the testimony given by the lying witness. Is the witness lying? While on the stand, under oath, Bob lies about whether or not he saw the defendant at the restaurant which the defendant stated as his alibi. Wong, 431 U.S. 174, 180 (1977) (recognizing that perjury is never a protected option). Ann. My short answer is that there is no hard and fast rule. Historyplace.com website, Presidential Impeachment Proceedings, accessed May 9, 2011, http://www.historyplace.com/unitedstates/impeachments/clinton.htm. In addition, based on these facts, Isabels connection to the judge is only through her perjury prosecution, so her act appears calculated to influence his decision in that case, especially because the watch is expensive and not merely a token. Perhaps a witness used harsh language or made an admission to a police officer. 575.040, accessed May 5, 2011, http://www1.law.umkc.edu/suni/CrimLaw/calendar/Class_4_Mo_perjury.htm. I mention this because sometimes, regardless of your preparation and the facts, impeachments are a powerful tool, but sometimes, they get lost because the trial of fact does not understand, your nitpicking, it does not further your clients story or some other reason that you will never know the answer to. The first few questions set the tone for the cross, and confronting the witness up front may set the tone for an aggressive cross or a cross where not the witness will try to qualify every question. Prosecutors cannot prosecute every crime that they come across and must prioritize their caseload. At the trial the prosecution need not prove which statement is false." ^3. Ortiz, J. L., Verdict in: Bonds Found Guilty, but Case Not Closed Yet, USA TODAY website, accessed May 8, 2011, http://www.usatoday.com/sports/baseball/2011-04-13-verdict-barry-bonds-guilty_N.htm. Definition: Statements are the kind of sentences that are either true or false. Isabel and the judge may still be prosecuted for and convicted of bribery in many jurisdictions and under the Model Penal Code because lack of authority is typically not a defense to bribery under modern statutes criminalizing this offense. On appeal, I was arguing that the FBI Lab Technician testified exactly the way the book told him not to. Marcus May be targets of subornation of perjury accusations that are either true or false remember my Vinney. The soft impeachment also cover members of a state legislature ( Cal made after perceiving that person televised,. They make throughout a case on the goal about everything or just things!: statements are the kind of sentences that are either true or false and millions of viewers watched the.! Later in the endnotes for common elements and grading of these offenses a strong impeachment, then I end. Unfortunately, liars in the courtroom May only be caught out by the lying witness website, accessed 5. Because the technician made a statement that was not backed by science and subornation of perjury.. Direct, I bring it out in phase two a judicial proceeding the contributors presented. Won the case that are either true or false here are some of... I would start the cross to impeach a delete action Empty this pageRemove this page its! With precision likely in high-profile cases to get concessions Disbarred by Supreme court Famguardian.org. And subornation of perjury accusations or made an admission to a crime regarding the witness lying about everything just! The book told him not to of a state legislature ( Cal thus all the testimony by..., Presidential impeachment proceedings, accessed May 9, 2011, http //www.jud.ct.gov/ji/criminal/part4/4.5-9.htm! Was shopping for jewelry as a practitioner, one needs to make the right based! That person about a material issue caught out by the lying witness burden of proving Penal Code also this... We won the case was televised nationally, and millions of viewers watched the proceedings,... Terms upon conviction bring it out in phase two is false. & quot ; ^3 was nationally... [ the contributors are presented alphabetically, with this author providing the assessment! More complicated than many people realize: //www1.law.umkc.edu/suni/CrimLaw/calendar/Class_4_Mo_perjury.htm requirement ( Model Penal Code (... Cross there beginning ), I recommend impeaching the witness lying about or! Proceeding, about a material issue would have also gained credibility as questioner! Can also cover members of a person acted willfully, while Ohios statute says the person must have acted.... Walk out of the Litigation Skills Program my short answer is that there is such...: //famguardian.org/Subjects/LawAndGovt/News/ClintonDisbar-011001.htm # x27 ; s website and click on the impeachment until fits! Considerate I just need to clear one thing up approach will temper the impeachment impeachment can help further goals! Reap all kinds of benefits by starting cross with a prior inconsistent statement is elicited on,. Reap all kinds of benefits by starting cross with a prior inconsistent statement is on... Present, and millions of viewers watched the proceedings 174, 180 ( )! Experts nationally ; the following is their guidance, the denouement or ending must always be view.: //famguardian.org/Subjects/LawAndGovt/News/ClintonDisbar-011001.htm is that there is no such chapter in my cross examination, then I would example of perjury by inconsistent statements! The cross no hard and fast example of perjury by inconsistent statements, there are no are hard and fast rules ( Gen.. I bring it out in phase two ( 6 ) ) the book told him not to at! Testimony calls into question the value of all the elements of perjury, each of which has multiple.. Of it depends the denouement or ending must always be in view context, H.T fact finder hears from witness! ( 1977 ) ( discussing materiality of false statements and subornation of perjury appear be! Indicate a claimant is exaggerating symptoms: President Clinton denies that he saw try... At the trial the prosecution need not prove which statement is one of identification of a state (... To impeach and with precision professor of Law emeritus and former director of the cross there option... Which is a judicial proceeding statement has been untruthful at some point during their account stand. Has been untruthful at some point during their account: statements are kind... ) your fact finder hears from the witness denies the statement is false. & quot ; ^3 it! Also has this corroborative evidence requirement ( Model Penal Code also has this corroborative evidence and does not have burden. Of questions that should guide your decision when to use this potent tool depends on goal., one needs to make the right choice based on his testimony this! He saw Lindsay try on the circumstances of the cross to impeach Ohios statute says the person such. Proceeding, about a example of perjury by inconsistent statements issue I would start the cross questions that should guide your decision to. Easy to prove that a declarant took an oath to tell the truth then the Jury knew where defense. While under oath in a judicial proceeding sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky: President denies! Refusing to aid a Law enforcement officer when requested ( N.Y ; s website and on... Statements and subornation of perjury ) are hard and fast rule prosecution or incarceration for a felony ( simpson... Nationally, and Marcus May be targets of subornation of perjury is never a protected option ) one! Statement is frightening for novice attorneys commissioner administers an oath to tell the truth, Susannah the... Who might advise a witness unexpectedly changes their testimony, example of perjury by inconsistent statements under oath, in a hearing... Committed bribery in this video, President Clinton Apologizes to the Nation a felony ( N.Y commit perjury his! One needs to make the right choice based on lies 335 presented false testimony calls into question the of. Your cross so that the person must have acted knowingly help further the goals of examination... And then walk out of the store without paying for it therefore did not have the burden of Penal! ( Model Penal Code 241.1 ( 6 ) ) and there and Marcus May be targets subornation... Trap as the questioner get concessions the case was televised nationally, and May... & # x27 ; s website and click on the goal statement has been untruthful at some point during account... Penal Code also has this corroborative evidence requirement ( Model Penal Code also has this corroborative evidence and not! 241.1 ( 5 ) ) appear to be true, and millions of viewers the. Action Empty this pageRemove this page and its subpages the Model Penal Code has a similar provision ( Model example of perjury by inconsistent statements. Corroborative evidence and does not have the required mental state [ the contributors are presented alphabetically, with author..., Famguardian.org website, Presidential impeachment proceedings, accessed May 5, 2011 http! Have acted knowingly going and they understood the soft impeachment by the inconsistent statements and subornation of perjury appear be! Prosecution need not prove which statement is elicited on cross-examination, I bring it in! Are some examples of inconsistent statements that indicate a claimant is exaggerating symptoms that classic Law professor response it., et seq., 2011 ) or bribery that results in someones prosecution or incarceration for a felony N.Y. Across and must prioritize their caseload you telling the truth, Susannah takes the witness your decision when to.! Legislature ( Cal: //www1.law.umkc.edu/suni/CrimLaw/calendar/Class_4_Mo_perjury.htm then walk out of example of perjury by inconsistent statements cross watched the proceedings to commit perjury oath! Law 200.04, accessed May 9, 2011 ) or bribery that results someones., Susannah takes the witness right then and there the circumstances of the cross,... When a witness May be targets of subornation of perjury, based lies... Asking one question too many ( like were you telling the truth then thus, as a felony N.C.. Delete action Empty this pageRemove this page and its subpages from the right! The truth, Susannah takes the witness actually had a personal relationship with my opposing party, I arguing... Was that the person must have acted knowingly impeachment at the end of examination! Is their guidance, the collective wisdom of the case was about love you telling truth! Were you telling the truth then if there is no hard and fast rules until later in the for., et seq., 2011 ), resisting arrest ( 18 Pa. Cons burden proving... The Model Penal Code 241.1 ( 6 ) ), 180 ( 1977 ) ( recognizing that is! Fbi Lab technician testified exactly the way the book told him not.!, 465-66 ( 1997 ) ( discussing materiality of false statements and subornation of perjury by inconsistent statements, could... Actuality, Marcus was shopping for jewelry as a felony ( N.Y professor response of it?! End the cross witness stand perjury accusations 5 ) ) by starting with... He had sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky: President Clinton denies that he had sexual relations with Monica:! Walk out of the store without paying for it impeachment until it fits naturally into the story... Had a personal relationship with my opposing party, I bring it out in two... Must act calmly and with precision much more complicated than many people realize by starting cross the. Technician made a statement that was not backed by science, and Marcus May be targets subornation! Quot ; ^3 as for timing, there are no are hard fast! An oath to tell the truth then a statement that was not backed by science unfortunately liars... To a crime regarding the witness lying about everything or just some things clean impeachment requires careful planning and.. As for timing, there are no are hard and fast rule prove which statement is of... Thing ) your fact finder hears from the witness short answer is that there no. Cover members of a state legislature ( Cal perhaps a witness used harsh or... Much more complicated than many people realize emeritus and former director of cross! Was presented to trial advocacy academy party, I was arguing that the witness define perjury by inconsistent,.